[asterisk-dev] [asterisk-commits] simon.perreault: branch group/v6-new r274766 - /team/group/v6-new/main/

[Tilghman Lesher]

On Thursday 08 July 2010 13:00:47 Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2010-07-08 13:57, Simon Perreault wrote:
> >> you can similarly use the IPv4-mapped
> >> addresses within IPv6 to create an address which is backward-compatible
> >> with using the IPv4 address, assuming the upper bits are set correctly. 
> >> Of course, if the upper bits aren't set to the IPv4 mapping, the least
> >> significant 32-bits isn't an IPv4 address, but we can deal with that
> >> situation at least better.
> >
> > How would this be different from IPv4-mapped addresses?
>
> I obviously mis-parsed what you wrote. But I'm still failing to
> understand what you're suggesting.

Never mind.  I didn't look into the structures beforehand, so it doesn't make
any sense anyway.

-- 
Tilghman Lesher
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
twitter: Corydon76 | IRC: Corydon76-dig (Freenode)
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org