[asterisk-dev] [asterisk-commits] simon.perreault: branch group/v6-new r274766 - /team/group/v6-new/main/

[Simon Perreault]

On 2010-07-08 13:57, Simon Perreault wrote:
>> you can similarly use the IPv4-mapped
>> addresses within IPv6 to create an address which is backward-compatible with
>> using the IPv4 address, assuming the upper bits are set correctly.  Of course,
>> if the upper bits aren't set to the IPv4 mapping, the least significant
>> 32-bits isn't an IPv4 address, but we can deal with that situation at least
>> better.
> 
> How would this be different from IPv4-mapped addresses?

I obviously mis-parsed what you wrote. But I'm still failing to
understand what you're suggesting.

Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org