[asterisk-dev] "Digium development team" - not Asterisk dev team

[Olle E. Johansson]

20 apr 2010 kl. 15.30 skrev Kevin P. Fleming:

> Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> 20 apr 2010 kl. 14.48 skrev Leif Madsen:
>> 
>>> The Digium development team
>> 
>> I get sad when I only see this name being used - and not "the Asterisk development team". Maybe it's time to write the history of the old "Asterisk dev team" and put it to rest. 
>> 
>> At the same time, because of this being the case in more and more communication from Digium, the expectation only gets bigger that Digium will add all needed resources and it's very hard for the rest of us to get any commercial support for our development work... I will soon have to just file bug reports for a lot of my branches and let the Digium Development Team handle the code to commit before they gets too rotten and old, like the developer who wrote them... 
> 
> This *entire* email thread is about resource allocation, planning and
> management. It is *completely* appropriate to refer to the 'Digium
> development team' in that context, because Digium cannot
> allocate/plan/manage the community developers' time and efforts for
> working on Asterisk.

Which I in the part that you deleted acknowledged. My comment was very general and not very specific to that thread - which is why I also changed the topic. Like you, I select what to respond to. I haven't seen any response to my comments on the lack of 1.8 discussion within the Asterisk development team. You responded on a separate issue in the same thread, but not to my initial mail... I guess you are as tired of this discussion as I am. Let's put it to rest with agreeing on disagreeing.

Which makes me even more sad.
/O