[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] Allow passing multiple arguments to applications specified in features.conf

[David Vossel]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/547/#review1832
-----------------------------------------------------------



/trunk/configs/features.conf.sample
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/547/#comment3923>

    The syntax for this changed when the <Application> contains both the application name and the arguments in (). As you have it written now, when this is the case the <AppArguments> part of the syntax becomes the MOH_CLASS.  I know this is intended behavior, but it isn't clear to me in this documentation the proper way to set the MOH_CLASS in that case.  I can see how someone might expect feature => #9,peer,Application(arg1,arg2),,mohclass to work, but in that case the mohclass will be overwritten.


- David


On 2010-03-10 18:04:41, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/547/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-03-10 18:04:41)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Yet another case where the conversion of the application delimiter to comma caused an issue.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 16646.
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16646
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/configs/features.conf.sample 244504 
>   /trunk/main/features.c 244504 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/547/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tilghman
> 
>