[asterisk-dev] ISDN Calling/Caller/Redirecting Subaddress support work.

[Alec Davis]

No response. Presume no further work, if so please speak up.
 
I've now started work on libpri, to use the appropriate infrastucture thats
been put in place, all bound by an '#if
defined(POSSIBLE_FUTURE_SUBADDRESS_SUPPORT)'.
 
But next is, how is it anticipated that CALLERID, CONNECTEDLINE and
REDIRECTING will interact with the subaddr.
 
I'm proposing the following;
  CALLERID(subaddr) = set/read the CallingSubAddr
  CONNECTEDLINE(subaddr) = set/read the CalledSubAddr
  REDIRECTING(subaddr) = set/read the RedirectingSubAddr  
 
Maybe I'm wrong, any further comments, which may help to get this done
correctly first time.
 
Alec Davis
 
 
  _____  

From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alec Davis
Sent: Wednesday, 23 September 2009 8:02 a.m.
To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-dev] ISDN Calling/Caller/Redirecting Subaddress support
work.


Before I reinvent the wheel, is there any preliminary work to support
sending the Caller/Calling/Redirecting Subaddr for ISDN, receiving
CallingSubAddr has already been supported for a few years. 
 
Referring to https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15604 I'd already done
the basic work, but it's immediately deprecated, it's based on channel
variables ${CALLEDSUBADDR} and ${CALLEDSUBADDR}, I didn't get to
${REDIRECTINGSUBADDR}
 
Previosuly when I've asked, wheter coincidental or not, Richard Mudgett
uploaded code, must have been sitting ready to go, it had some of the
structure there.
 
Has any further work been done to finish this off, or how far off is it?
 
Alec Davis
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20090924/48b4e57e/attachment-0001.htm