[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] SIP: Pineapple

[Alexander Harrowell]

On Thursday 22 October 2009 12:18:41 Michiel van Baak wrote:
>
> No.
> It's pretty common to have a couple of ITSP's configured to do
> least-cost-routing based on the number you are calling.
> One of the ITSP's will be responsible for inbound calls on your main
> numbers.
> But in mosts setups we did we have more of those because of DID's in
> different countries etc.
>
> And we have a good couple of setups that have an asterisk box specific
> for routing, it grabs the calls from ITSP and landlines and routes those
> calls to other boxen. Most of them use a different route when setting up
> an outbound call.
>
> Many many possibilities that dont match the simple setup you described.
>

Indeed, and there's no reason not to cater for them. It just seems deeply 
weird to have a syntax so very different from the way SIP, and telephony in 
general, usually works. User/peer/friend doesn't, for example, make any 
distinction between an end point and a router.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20091022/68088f34/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20091022/68088f34/attachment.pgp