[asterisk-dev] extra dahdi dialing format? [was: Re: [svn-commits] rmudgett: branch rmudgett/dahdi_deflection r224027 - /team/rmudgett/dahdi_def...]

[Will]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Kai Hoerner <kai at ciphron.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Other channels already use parameters like "mISDN/g:1/12345678/ns"..
>
> What about using "DAHDI/g1/12345678/K<digits>" and not doing it the
> other way round?
>
>
> Regards,
> Kaii
>
>
>
> Richard Mudgett schrieb:
> > It is a rather odd feature.  Also, other delimiter characters that looked
> any good were already used.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tzafrir Cohen" <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com>
> > To: "Asterisk Developers list" <asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:52:36 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> > Subject: [asterisk-dev] extra dahdi dialing format? [was: Re:
> [svn-commits] rmudgett: branch rmudgett/dahdi_deflection r224027 -
>  /team/rmudgett/dahdi_def...]
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:26:47PM -0000, SVN commits to the Digium
> repositories wrote:
> >
> >> Author: rmudgett
> >> Date: Tue Oct 13 18:26:43 2009
> >> New Revision: 224027
> >>
> >> URL: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=rev&rev=224027
> >> Log:
> >> Redo the asterisk portion of the keypad digits in SETUP support.
> >>
> >> *  Make use CHANNEL(keypad_digits) instead of channel variable
> PRI_KEYPAD.
> >> *  Allow the possibility of also sending out a called number at the same
> >> time with this syntax:  Dial(DAHDI/g1[[/K<keypad_digits>]/extension]).
> >>
> >
> > This is a rather non-standard dialink format.
> >
> >
> >> Modified:
> >>     team/rmudgett/dahdi_deflection/channels/chan_dahdi.c
> >>     team/rmudgett/dahdi_deflection/channels/sig_pri.c
> >>     team/rmudgett/dahdi_deflection/channels/sig_pri.h
> >>
> >> Modified: team/rmudgett/dahdi_deflection/channels/chan_dahdi.c
> >> URL:
> http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/rmudgett/dahdi_deflection/channels/chan_dahdi.c?view=diff&rev=224027&r1=224026&r2=224027
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Additionally, I was under the impression that BRI, PRI and SS7 signaling
allowed alphanumeric extensions, though I may be remembering incorrectly.

William
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20091014/94d537d8/attachment-0001.htm