[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] better SDP parsing algorithm for 1.4

Matthew Nicholson mnicholson at digium.com
Fri Oct 2 12:20:19 CDT 2009


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/385/#review1138
-----------------------------------------------------------


At first glance this looks good.  Please describe the testing you have done in a little more detail.  Before committing, I would like to take a deeper look at this and get a few more eyes on it.  Good work.

- Matthew


On 2009-10-02 07:44:36, frawd wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/385/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2009-10-02 07:44:36)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers, Olle E Johansson and Matthew Nicholson.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This patch cleans up asterisk's SDP parsing algorithm, resolving a few bugs including #14994. It does the parsing line by line, making a distinction between session-level and media-specific parameters. It also optimizes the parsing adding functions for audio/video/image specific scanning.
> I added debug information for a better understanding on how the parsing is actually done (shows each SDP line parsed with OK or UNSUPPORTED).
> 
> If ported to 1.6 (sorry but I have no idea how the SIP code changed between 1.4 and 1.6 so I don't know how to do it), it will allow to easily add SDP functionality.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 0014994.
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=0014994
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   branches/1.4/channels/chan_sip.c 221961 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/385/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Production tested for multiple audio and video devices in a version of the patch for 1.4.26.2 (see bug #14994).
> 
> Not tested with T.38, but it should work well.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> frawd
> 
>




More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list