[asterisk-dev] i extension does not match on initial context - bug or not?

[Philipp Kempgen]

Klaus Darilion schrieb:
> Benny Amorsen schrieb:
>> Dmitry Andrianov <dimas at dataart.com> writes:
>> 
>>> There is NO functionality for catch-all currently exist. Extension
>>> can be alphanumeric so just [0-9*+] is not enough. The closest
>>> pattern would be "_." which matches anything at all but the problem
>>> with it is that it also matches "special" extensions like h, i, t,
>>> s.
>> 
>> It is a bit sad that the special extensions live in the same
>> namespace as normal extensions. The reasons are historical, of
>> course, from when Asterisk was mostly concerned with connecting to
>> the PSTN, but these days it is becoming a problem.
> 
> Yes, this should be splitted into separate name spaces. In config we 
> could use for example @i or @s to address the special extensions.

+1


   Philipp Kempgen

-- 
AMOOCON 2009, May 4-5, Rostock / Germany   ->  http://www.amoocon.de
Asterisk: http://the-asterisk-book.com - http://das-asterisk-buch.de
AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied  ->  http://www.amooma.de
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister: Neuwied B14998
--