[asterisk-dev] i extension does not match on initial context - bug or not?

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Thu Jan 8 09:44:52 CST 2009


Hi Leif and Nir!

Thanks for the description.

So, as obviously I (and others) try to abuse the i extension as 
catch-all, wouldn't it make sense to introduce a catch-all extension?

IMO _X. is not sufficient (what about dialing +431234 or *31#, ...) and 
_. can not be used as it also matches the special extensions.

regards
Klaus

Leif Madsen schrieb:
> I do not believe this is a bug. The 'i' extension is used for invalid, 
> but not a catch all.
> 
> By using the Goto() and sending it to an invalid extension, then the 'i' 
> is executed because a dialplan application in Asterisk tried to execute 
> something that did not exist.
> 
> The 'i' extension is more used to control errors with logic in your 
> dialplan execution, and not so much as a 'catch-all' for when you dial 
> an extension that does not exist.
> 
> At least this is my understanding.
> 
> Leif Madsen.
> http://www.leifmadsen.com
> http://www.asteriskdocs.org
> 
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I just stumbled about an already known problem:
>> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+i+extension
>>
>> The i extension does not match in the initial context, e.g:
>>
>> context fromSipPhone {
>>          11 => {
>>                  Answer();
>>                  Wait(20);
>>          }
>>          i => {
>>                  Playback(pbx-invalid);
>>          }
>> }
>>
>> In this example, if the SIP phone dials 22, the i extension is not executed.
>>
>> But in this example:
>>
>> context fromSipPhone {
>>          _X. => goto fromSipPhoneWorkaround |${EXTEN}|1;
>> }
>>
>> context fromSipPhoneWorkaround {
>>          11 => {
>>                  Answer();
>>                  Wait(20);
>>          }
>>          i => {
>>                  Playback(pbx-invalid);
>>          }
>> }
>>
>> Here, if the SIP phone dials 22, the i extension is executed.
>>
>> IMO this is inconsistent behavior - and I would consider this a bug.
>>
>> Thus - should I open a bug report or is there a certain reason for the 
>> strange behavior?
>>
>> thanks
>> klaus
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>>
>> asterisk-dev mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev



More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list