[asterisk-dev] Planning for Asterisk 1.6.1 - chan_sip

Johansson Olle E oej at edvina.net
Wed Feb 18 01:34:03 CST 2009


17 feb 2009 kl. 23.40 skrev Matthew Nicholson:

> On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 21:58 +0100, Johansson Olle E wrote:
>> 17 feb 2009 kl. 21.16 skrev Russell Bryant:
>>>
>>> Oej has written a document that describes how user/peer/friend
>>> matching
>>> should work here:
>>>
>>> http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/team/oej/sip-compliance/sipobjects.txt?view=markup
>>>
>>> I think that what is written here sounds good to me.  Does anyone  
>>> else
>>> have any comments?  Also, do we have code to write to get this to be
>>> the
>>> reality in the 1.6.1 code base?
>>
>>
>> No, we don't have the code. I was going to start as soon as I had  
>> some
>> feedback.
>> Anyone else with opinions?
>>
>> This really need to be fixed and tested heavily before release.
>>
>> /O
>
> Instead of having a bunch of different hard coded types (friend, user,
> peer, trunk, service), I think we should have a set of options that  
> each
> type corresponds to.  For example, if I just want to match incoming
> calls on ip and port, there should be something like match=ip,port.
> Setting type=peer should just implicitly set match=ip,port.   
> Otherwise I
> fear we will end up with a special type= option for each type of
> matching people want to do.
>
> Basically I think we should enumerate each sip call matching  
> strategy a
> user may want to use, then create various options that match.
>
I would combine that with aliases for those that wants some assistance
and have more simple setups.

Let's focus on the current part, the 1.6.1 release where we don't change
the behaviour and take the futuristic part later...

/O



More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list