[asterisk-dev] manager event conversion strategy (was: oej: branch oej/managergames r174538 - /team/oej/managergames/)

[Johansson Olle E]

10 feb 2009 kl. 18.00 skrev Russell Bryant:

>
> On Feb 10, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Johansson Olle E wrote:
>
>>> I guess my main concern is that I don't want to compromise quality  
>>> of
>>> the new interface for the sake of making it exactly backwards
>>> compatible with manager 1.1.  Given the work that was done to  
>>> improve
>>> consistency in manager 1.1, It may not be an issue.  We'll see!
>
>>>
>> Well, the result may very well be manager 1.2 with some small
>> changes for a few bugs that we find... Let's try to avoid that
>> and take the challenge. :-)
>
>
> That works for me.
>
> Another thing to note is that we are going to end up with a lot of
> additional events in the new interface that were not in manager 1.1.
> The new CEL system is based on the event framework, and in that patch,
> a lot of new events have been added.  Some of those events may already
> be pretty much the same as a manager event right next to it.  So, we
> should consider what is in that branch for this project as well to
> help reduce what work we have to do.

Absolutely. Maybe we should prematurely add the CEL-version of the  
event header files
to trunk so that both branches can work on the same header files?

It's not like I have any code coming within hours, just starting the  
discussion...

/O
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2206 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20090210/d68c6d6a/attachment.bin