[asterisk-dev] Defining new section type in sip.conf - question about syntax

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 04:08:45PM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> 
> > I personally favour #1, even though it's not very beautiful. It's used  
> > today in Asterisk.
> 
> I prefer that as well, although there is of course the risk that the
> chosen naming pattern will conflict with actual peer/user entry names
> that some user is already using.
> 
> There is a third option, not necessarily prettier, but that is to just
> create another configuration file (sip_domains.conf or something
> similar). The Asterisk configuration mechanism is really only designed
> to handle one type of 'object' per configuration file, and even the
> example you specified for extensions.conf they are still all the same
> type of 'object' (a dialplan context), they just have different semantic
> meaning.

Just to clarify things:

Do you think that there's any use for:

[common](!)
<some stuff>

[example.org](common)
type = domain
<domain stuff>

[peer-example](common)
type = peer
<peer stuff>

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir