[asterisk-dev] Reverse Inheritance

[Richard Mudgett]

Tilghman Lesher wrote:

> I was thinking that it should happen exactly once, at the end of a bridge.
>
>So what happens when Dial() creates three channels, and one of them sets
>a reverse-inheritance variable, but then is not the channel who answers
>and thus never gets bridged?
>
>Is this facility going to be *only* applicable to bridged channels? If
>so, it will need to be very clearly documented that way. If that is the
>case, then the 'multilevel' version could only ever apply to Local
>channels, since that is the only method of having more than one bridge
>in the chain of inheritance.

This idea could be useful for CCBS/CCNR to pass back a call completion
record ID.  However, that call will never reach the bridged state.

Richard