[asterisk-dev] [asterisk-addons-commits] tilghman: trunk r688 - in /trunk: ./ channels/ configs/ res/

[Russell Bryant]

Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> I'm not sure that your fix really is just that.  I'm concerned about it
> introducing further regressions.  The fix I created for addons-1.6.1 will
> fix the issue permanently, in a way that is scalable and doesn't simply
> remove the capability of separating reads from writes, which is what your
> patch effectively does.
> 
> Yes, I admit the feature add in 1.6.0 was inadequate and disabled an
> important feature, and it is fixed going forward, but disabling another
> feature is just as much a regression.

If a new feature that was introduced in 1.6.0 caused a regression for 
functionality present in Asterisk 1.2 and 1.4, then I would say remove 
the feature from 1.6.0.  Is that the situation?

-- 
Russell Bryant
Senior Software Engineer
Open Source Team Lead
Digium, Inc.