[asterisk-dev] Time for a bug fix phase?

[John Lange]

On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 08:53 +0100, Grey Man wrote:
> If the CDR coding starts again without coming up with a proper design
> AND getting it agreed to by the couple of Digium employees that have
> veto power on the Asterisk code contributions then it's likely to be a
> wasted effort again.
> 
> The biggest problem here isn't developer resources it's getting a
> design agreed on that will be incorporated into Asterisk. I could code
> up a solution myself but it defeats the purpose if I then need to
> maintain it separately and have to patch every subsequent Asterisk
> release.
> 
> It still seems like a mountain is being made out of a molehill as
> well. Blind and attended transfers are not complex operations and the
> CDRs they generate are pretty simple. They are the two types of calls
> that by all accounts are causing people the most pain. Rather then
> solving 20 esoteric cases why not solve the two simple ones first and
> make 90% or more of the people following the bug happy. To date I
> haven't even seen any comments on the two CDR bug reports on calls for
> cases other then transfers.

I agree, lets just start by fixing the bug that exists and make it work
the way it's supposed to work.

At the moment logging on transfers is just plain broken.

Regards,
-- 
John Lange
www.johnlange.ca