[asterisk-dev] [policy] Bug Tracker Workflow Discussion

[BJ Weschke]

Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:05:30 Johansson Olle E wrote:
>   
>> 10 jul 2008 kl. 16.40 skrev Leif Madsen:
>>     
>>> Performance issues will only be considered for the
>>> release branch if they are considered significant, and should be
>>> approved by the maintainers.
>>>
>>> If there is ever a question about what should be included in the
>>> release
>>> branch, the maintainers should be allowed to make the decision.
>>>       
>> What's the election procedure of the "maintainers" ?
>>
>> Maybe this should be changed to "Digium" to be more clear about the
>> current state of affairs.
>>     
>
> There are several people now that I would consider to be maintainers who
> are not employees of Digium, and some others who are working towards
> that goal.  Much of the development is done by mutual assent.  We all get
> along to some degree or another, or else it wouldn't be much of a community.
>
>   
 I've been rather silent lately both in groups and on commits, but a big +1 to Tilghman's comments. It's what still keeps me around lurking in the shadows. :-) 

-- 
--
Bird's The Word Technologies, Inc.
http://www.btwtech.com/