[asterisk-dev] One-Channel-Useless CDR's.... HELP!!

Jim Capp jcapp at anteil.com
Fri Feb 1 10:02:04 CST 2008


Steve,

    We rely heavily on CDR and would be happy to test it out.   I am 
prepared to test it on one of our production machines that is active in 
our office and currently running 1.4.18-rc4.

Jim


Steve Murphy wrote:
> Hello--
>
> I'm in a state of indecision about what to do with bug 11516...
> (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11516) I need some help from the
> CDR-conscious user community.
>
> ys generously, graciously, supplies a patch that removes unanswered
> one-channel CDR records, based on the new config-file 'unanswered'
> variable in cdr.conf.
>
> His patch basically moves the code I inserted into the Dial() app, and
> moves it into the main CDR flow by putting it in the post_cdr() func in
> main/cdr.c. This is not a bad approach, and I don't mind doing it. It
> **could** be a step up, a big improvement...
>
> BUT, I'm pretty nervous about changing 1.4 code. I'd really appreciate
> it if maybe 5 or 10 folks with money riding on CDR processing would take
> the time to review and test the patch in bug 11516 and post their
> thoughts to that bug.
>
> If no-one cares or objects, the "squeakiest wheel", namely ys and anest,
> who gave it a big "yes" vote, will win and I'll merge it into 1.4 and
> trunk.
>
> In general, CDR's need a pretty major overhaul in Asterisk, but that's a
> different topic, and I'm not going there, at least not right now.
>
> murf
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev




More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list