[asterisk-dev] chan_cellphone - Mantis issue 8919

[Steve Totaro]

Michael Cargile wrote:
>> Personally I like chan_bluetooth.  I don't think chan_mobile really
>> describes what it does.  Chan mobile does not make me think "i'll use my
>> bluetooth hand set with this asterisk channel".
>>
>> As far as the channel driver suporting other technologies in the future,
>> we could just rename it then (and have this lengthy discussion again).
>>
>>     
>
> Personally I like chan_mobile because it covers all the bases that this
> driver will cover in the not too distant future. When I think
> chan_mobile I think hey this will support my mobil device, whatever it
> happens to be. Calling it by a name of what it currently supports makes
> no sense, if in a few months it will just have to be renamed anyways.
> Doing so will just add more confusion. If I hadn't happen to read this
> thread I would still be looking for chan_cellphone.
>
>   
Sort of like name Asterisk "Asterisk".  It is a wildcard that covers 
"everything".

Thanks,
Steve
www.asteriskhelpdesk.com