[asterisk-dev] Request for Vote on 5208,
SayAlpha does not read special characteres such as ", " and "/"
Clod Patry
cpatry at gmail.com
Thu Mar 15 08:13:34 MST 2007
i vote for yes, since that will be able to stream any chars.
I also can adapt the code with you Steve, like i did many months ago.
On 3/15/07, Steve Murphy <murf at digium.com> wrote:
>
> OK, here's the quick summary: If enough developers vote "yes" for this
> enhancement, Digium will pay for the recordings, and include them in the
> core release, along with finishing the code enhancements, in at least
> the trunk.
>
> The bug is 5208, an ancient enhancement request, submitted in Sept 2005,
> basically requesting that SayAlpha be expanded to include stuff like
> "semicolon" (;) and "colon" (:), and a series of others. This will
> require a few changes to the SayAlpha routines, and a small boatload of
> new sounds.
>
> As the bug discussion went back and forth, the list of new sounds grew
> to:
>
> (symbol) phrase (en)
> (:) colon
> (;) semicolon
> (_) underscore
> (,) comma
> (|) pipe
> (\) back-slash
> (%) percent
> (~) tilde
> (^) carot
> (&) ampersand
> (() left paren
> ()) right paren
> ([) left square brace
> (]) right square brace
> ({) left curly brace
> (}) right curly brace
> (<) less-than
> (>) greater-than
> (') single-quote
> (") double-quote
> (?) question-mark
> (`) back-quote
> (#) hash (for the en-GB crowd)
> (#) pound
> (*) Asterisk
>
> Mogorman actually got all these recorded last year in English, but at a
> lower sampling rate, and they don't meet standards any more, and will
> have to be re-recorded.
>
> If the vote for this addition is positive, I offered to have the
> translators into French/Spanish specify the extra characters that are a
> part of those languages, and the extra phrases that would be necessary
> to record to be able to speak them.
> (You know, like é, and suchlike).I would spend some time and update the
> SayAlpha code to make these work.
>
> The rub is that the sounds will cost Digium several hundreds of dollars
> to record, and that doesn't count the time that it would take to update
> the code to use the new sounds. Is it worth the effort?
>
> Rather than burden thousands of folks with your vote by replying via the
> list, please just send to me personally, and I'll tally the results and
> report back in a few days. I don't want to squelch any useful discussion
> about this issue tho, and if you have something to say, go ahead and say
> it. Heck, I didn't even need to say that, did I? ;)
>
> murf
>
>
> --
> Steve Murphy
> Software Developer
> Digium
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
>
>
--
Clod Patry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20070315/635de3c7/attachment.htm
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list