[asterisk-dev] 答复: asterisk-dev Digest, Vol 32, Issue 39

Tom Lee tomleegz at gmail.com
Thu Mar 15 06:16:37 MST 2007


Yes

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] 代表
asterisk-dev-request at lists.digium.com
发送时间: 2007年3月15日 20:28
收件人: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
主题: asterisk-dev Digest, Vol 32, Issue 39

Send asterisk-dev mailing list submissions to
	asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	asterisk-dev-request at lists.digium.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
	asterisk-dev-owner at lists.digium.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of asterisk-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Re: Proposed Sound Acceptance Policy (Tzafrir Cohen)
   2. Re: Proposed Sound Acceptance Policy (Benny Amorsen)
   3. hi all (pandi  ponnangan)
   4. Call progress event? (pandi  ponnangan)
   5. Fwd: [asterisk-users] ${EXTEN} is limited to 17	characters
      under IAX ? (Oded Arbel)
   6. Re: Fwd: [asterisk-users] ${EXTEN} is limited to 17
      characters under IAX ? (Clod Patry)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:58:20 +0200
From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] Re: Proposed Sound Acceptance Policy
To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
Message-ID: <20070314195820.GD10515 at xorcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:40:19AM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> >>>>> "SM" == Steve Murphy <murf at digium.com> writes:
> 
> SM> In order to get sounds into the official tarball distributions,
> SM> here is the requirements, as far as I can make out:
> 
> SM> 1. The scripts of the sounds are provided in English, in text
> SM> format, 8859-1 format.
> 
> If they are in English, what's wrong with plain ASCII? Going
> incompatible with UTF-8 just to be able to spell naC/ve seems a bit
> excessive.

Nah, this text has to describe the exact meaning of the textb



More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list