[asterisk-dev] extensions.conf included contexts priorities

[Andrew Kohlsmith]

On Tuesday 24 April 2007 11:56 pm, Nicholas Campion wrote:
> I started out disliking this method and trying to find a point of failure.
> I would conclude that its not the "intuitive" method, but it does seem to
> be functional.  I would, if I were *entirely* new, expect the include=> to
> insert the values in the included context directly at that location.
> Consider me enlightened.

That's exactly what I'd have expected to happen as well...  If not, maybe some 
damn-i-seem-to-still-be-a-newbie-after-years-of-using-asterisk warning that 
states "include statement encountered before end of context, this may not do 
what you expect it to do" type of thing.

-A.