[asterisk-dev] OT: Where Mailing List Replies Should Go

[J. Oquendo]

Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> You're familiar with randy bush's paper suggesting that BGP flap
> dampening was a bad idea?  (I wasn't either, but I ran across it the
> other day, and it seemed pertinent to mention it here:
>
> https://rip.psg.com/~randy/020910.zmao-flap.pdf )
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
>   
Did YOU actually read the document. If you did you would take the time 
to notice on page 10 it addresses the issues with dampening to get it 
working the way it was intended. So again to reiterate comments on my 
previous post where I gave examples of what *MIGHT* be done or should be 
*INVESTIGATED* as a *POSSIBLE* solution to *REMEDY* the issues were 
ideas. They were meant to stimulate discussion to find a FIX for the 
issue. They were not thrown out there as a "I broke this and you can't 
fix it" message. If that were the case these emails would be going to 
the f(ool)ull disclosure list. It's easy to yap away of how everything 
is so wrong wrong wrong without offering anything fruitful other than 
some obnoxious response. Its a lot more inviting to discuss the 
situation as opposed to responding with waste.

-- 
====================================================
J. Oquendo
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1383A743
sil . infiltrated @ net http://www.infiltrated.net 

The happiness of society is the end of government.
John Adams

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5157 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20061009/438c9dc6/smime.bin