[asterisk-dev] Strange error when sending SMS on Zap
Julian Lyndon-Smith
asterisk at dotr.com
Wed May 31 09:45:08 MST 2006
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
>> Ooo. That hurt. Sorry, my semantics were wrong. I simply presumed that
>> as the "notice" did not happen with 1.2 and it does with svn trunk and
>> the control frame was unknown someone might want to have a look at what
>> had changed.
>
> There is no need to take it personally. I was only stating facts.
Yeah - I've been working for 18 hours on trunk. A bit tired, and I
thought it would be better to post to -dev instead of raising a bug
report :)
>
> The reason this happens with SVN trunk and does not happen with 1.2 is
> not clear; that control frame type (PROCEEDING) also exists in 1.2.
> However, since this is most likely not the cause of any problems, it's
> doubtful that it's an issue that really needs to be addressed. Most
> likely something has changed in chan_zap and/or libpri that is causing
> this PROCEEDING frame to be sent up when it did not use to be; I have
> just modified the code in channel.c to completely ignore all the control
> frames that it doesn't need to care about, instead of generating this
> useless message.
That's great. Thanks.
>
>> If people get slapped for testing and raising potential problems with
>> your trunk, then perhaps they won't ...
>
> You were not slapped :-) It's just important that problem reports be
> factual, correct and complete, otherwise the developer(s) waste time
I agree - I'm a developer too
> trying to understand what may be wrong (or not). That is why we have
> such stringent bug posting guidelines on the bug tracker... the bug
> marshals and developers have very limited time available and don't like
> to spend it 'guessing' what may be going on.
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
>
I'll try to be more precise in the future.
Julian
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list