[asterisk-dev] Zaptel udev checking svn 1064

[Kevin P. Fleming]

Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:

> We shouldn't need to comment out any rules if we name the file that we
> install "/etc/udev/rules.d/10-zaptel.rules".

The only way we could guarantee that would be to name it
00-zaptel.rules, or something like that... and even that would not be
perfect.

I think the only other reasonable action might be to scan
/etc/udev/rules.d/* for any other files that appear to contain Zaptel
rules and warn the admin that the new rules might not get used... thoughts?