[asterisk-dev] more dynamic zaptel

[Kevin P. Fleming]

Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

> Is a span a better object for such actions or does chan_zap
> (mainly/exclusivly) deals with channels?

chan_zap does not really deal with Zaptel spans at all, just channels
(and groups of channels).

Changing chan_zap to handle channel addition/removal will be
non-trivial, though; even handling non-contiguous channel numbering is
less than optimal right now (everything is done using arrays).