[asterisk-dev] QSIG error -- can somebody explain?

[Matthew Fredrickson]

On Feb 16, 2006, at 3:52 PM, janvb at caselaboratories.com wrote:

> hi
>>
>> If you'd care to tell us what's wrong with his setup message, that 
>> might help some of us try to fix it.  From what I saw in ECMA-143 (at 
>> least for the bearer capability IE), everything there should not 
>> cause a protocol error; however, I don't know enough about the 
>> differences between normal Q.931 specs and Q.SIG specs to identify 
>> what is causing his problem.
> Both ETSI and ECMA specs are free for download, so if you look at the 
> Bearer Capability IE you see the difference straight away. Q.SIG is 
> close to Q.931 with the same message header and same IE buildup so you 
> have to compare the IE's contents to see the differences.
>
>

Well, PCadach and I were talking today, and it looks like there is a 
problem (with channel_id IE) related possibly to bristuff's changes.  
There did not appear to be a problem (or discrepancy) between 
ECMA-143's specification for bearer capability and Q.931.  So if there 
is something else that we might not have noticed... feel free to point 
it out.  Otherwise, quit gloating over it and be quiet.  For all the 
emails you have written in this thread, you could have very easily told 
us what you noticed.

Matthew Fredrickson