[asterisk-dev] Zaptel 1.0 to latest version update
tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
Tue Feb 7 12:26:03 MST 2006
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 01:57:32PM -0500, Rod Dorman wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 12:58:00, Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Rod Dorman wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Is there some phobia about odd numbers? Why wouldn't the next
> >> "release" be Asterisk 1.3?
> > In the open source world, typically odd numbered versions are the
> > "testing/development" releases and even numbers are the official
> > "consumer ready" releases.
> Theres numerous counter examples to that, e.g. OpenBSD which has a
> release cycle http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors similar to
> the new Asterisk one http://www.asterisk.org/developers/releasecycle
> Skipping odd numbers is like not having a 13th floor because you're
> I read the intent of the new Development and Release Cycle to be that
> every x.y release will be "consumer ready".
You can think of the current development branch as version 1.3.x . e.g:
1.3.0.<revision> . If you really need the version formatted as a version
Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 +972-50-7952406
tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com http://www.xorcom.com
More information about the asterisk-dev