[asterisk-dev] Re: Improvement of coding practices

[Jonathan k. Creasy]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-dev-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tony Mountifield
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 4:34 AM
> To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
> Subject: [asterisk-dev] Re: Improvement of coding practices
> 
> In article <200612271520.04349.tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com>,
> Tilghman Lesher <tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 December 2006 07:46, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > Some of my suggestions are also in the waiting queue that can be
seen
> in
> > > the bug/feature request tracker.
> >
> > It is a bugtracker only.  Feature requests properly belong on the
Wiki,
> not on
> > the bugtracker.
> 
> Despite the bug tracker having a project called "Feature Requests" and
a
> report severity called "feature"?
> 
> Also, in the bug guidelines, under "So, what is the purpose of the
> bugtracker?", it says "The secondary use is to track feature requests,
> which are not as critical as bugs and which will receive second
priority
> in all cases."
> 
> If this policy has changed (and I'm not at all convinced it should),
then
> the guidelines ought to reflect this.
> 

I am 100% against changing that policy if anyone is thinking of doing
so. The best way to see, test, document and discuss new features is in
the tracker. Removing new feature requests/features from this system
would put an artificial limit on the community. 

-Jonathan