[asterisk-dev] autoconf_and_menuselect branch

[Andrey S. Pankov]

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

> Yes it did. Anything 'architectural' in nature that was submitted after
> that date will not be merged for 1.4.

I doubt... how do you see it technically?

> Your opinion would carry more weight with the community if you had been
> a long-standing contributing member (as you can see by the lack of
> responses to your original post). We frequently have people join the

19 months is not enough to be "a long-standing contributing member", rigth?
Let me remember you that we both started at the same time (Oct 2004).
At least this is what karma transactions show... And the date of the
first bug report for both of us is 09-25-04. I'm always was in TOP 15
contributing member list. Any questions here?

As to the lack of responses you are definitively wrong. People do not
want to make public what they think, they are afraid that in that case
they get negative karma or their patches/bug reports won't receive
enough attention... How many points does add to your "weight" the fact
you are a Digium employee? How much money does it add to your budget?
Do you see the difference? It's very easy to say "we committed lots of
you changes recently, you shuold be happy now... but do not expect this
to happen again in the nearest future" (c) Olle. It's not enough
"really appreciate" what other people do, you'd really appreciate that
they do it for free for their own pleasure, not to make money, but to
help others and to help the project. I'd really like Digium to hire a
QA consultant. It seems like it is a must have in the current situation.

Any thoughts?

Regards,
casper