[asterisk-dev] iLBC packet loss concealment

[Denis Smirnov]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:12:34AM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

>> If it be done, that option would not needed, and it be very nice thing.
KPF> Well, it will be nice if and when any direct conversions become
KPF> available. Right now the only one available in the Asterisk standard
KPF> code base is alaw/ulaw, and going via SLIN doesn't make a huge
KPF> difference there.

I think about adding WB/UWB speex versions support.

-- 
JID: ds at im.seiros.ru
ICQ: 58417635 (please, use jabber, if you can)

http://freesource.info/