[asterisk-dev] iLBC packet loss concealment (was: code-cleanup concerns)

[Anton]

IMHO: To sound better than PSTN you either must transmit 
more than 64Kbps audio or have poor PSTN connection to 
compare :)

On 16 April 2006 18:33, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> >On Sunday 16 April 2006 04:05, Matt Ranney wrote:
> >>My users tell me that Skype sounds better than asterisk
> >> even when going to the PSTN, but I think this might be
> >> because the headsets they are using just sound better
> >> than their Cisco 7940 handsets.
> >
> >the iLBC codec used in Skype is the wideband variety; it
> > *is* better than PSTN.
>
> Skype is certainly better than the PSTN when going Skype
> to Skype, but why do people think it sounds better than
> the PSTN when going to the PSTN? Is it just psycological,
> or are they using an environment (e.g. headset) that just
> sounds better than their usual phone? Having they been
> using a Cisco 7940 with G.729, where a real PSTN to PSTN
> connection would sounds rather better? I find it an
> interesting comment that Matt made.
>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev