[asterisk-dev] Application independent jitterbuffer
Rod Dorman
rodd at polylogics.com
Sun Apr 9 12:18:50 MST 2006
On Sunday, April 9, 2006, 13:18:41, Anton wrote:
> there is an implementation of the application independent
> jitterbuffer, with abstraction etc, can anyone say could it
> be integrated with asterisk RTP channels?
Please do not hijack threads.
The original "Re: [asterisk-dev] Announcing Astmanproxy 1.20"
e-mail had a message id of
Message-ID: <4439203D.7060608 at digium.com>
When you hit reply even though you changed the Subject your mail had the
header
In-Reply-To: <4439203D.7060608 at digium.com>
That links the two messages together and causes those of us who read our
mail 'threaded' to get annoyed with an off topic response.
It also means when someone isn't interested in the thread and kills it
off that your e-mail wont be read thus lessening the number of people
that might be able to help you.
If you are 'replying' to create a new message instead of starting one
from scratch please delete the In-Reply-To: header in addition to
changing the Subject: header.
--
rodd at polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too
Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list