[asterisk-dev] Application independent jitterbuffer

Rod Dorman rodd at polylogics.com
Sun Apr 9 12:18:50 MST 2006


On Sunday, April 9, 2006, 13:18:41, Anton wrote:
> there is an implementation of the application independent
> jitterbuffer, with abstraction etc, can anyone say could it 
> be integrated with asterisk RTP channels?

Please do not hijack threads.

The original "Re: [asterisk-dev] Announcing Astmanproxy 1.20"
e-mail had a message id of
Message-ID: <4439203D.7060608 at digium.com>

When you hit reply even though you changed the Subject your mail had the
header
In-Reply-To: <4439203D.7060608 at digium.com>

That links the two messages together and causes those of us who read our
mail 'threaded' to get annoyed with an off topic response.

It  also  means when someone isn't interested in the thread and kills it
off  that  your  e-mail wont be read thus lessening the number of people
that might be able to help you.

If  you  are  'replying' to create a new message instead of starting one
from  scratch  please  delete  the  In-Reply-To:  header  in addition to
changing the Subject: header.

-- 
rodd at polylogics.com     "The avalanche has already started, it is too
Rod Dorman              late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh




More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list