[asterisk-dev] SVN broken?

Sat Apr 8 07:56:35 MST 2006

On 07:51, Sat 08 Apr 06, Tuxinator Linux wrote:
> Doesn't guilty imply that it did something wrong?

It did.
It did add a request that svn did not do.
Ah well, thanks to kpfleming I now have a fresh tree.

Now I can work again.
-- 
Michiel van Baak
michiel at vanbaak.eu
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7E0B9A2D

"Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?"