[asterisk-dev] chan_skinny - SCOigo is now TROLLING

[North Antara]

Aaron Daniel wrote:

> *pipes up*
>
> I'll disclaim this by saying I've never developed on chan_sccp or 
> chan_skinny, but we have about 100 phones, running on CCM 3.1, that 
> use the busy lamp functionality.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but this 
> discussion seems to be saying that that's not possible with 7940's and 
> 7960's running sccp on a CCM?
>
> Second, um, can't this all be worked out in a less confrontational 
> manner on the list?  I think we all heard the same back and forth for 
> hours, it is getting kinda tiring... Just to play devil's advocate... 
> what's so difficult about getting the disclaimers and supporting the 
> asterisk community (sergio), biting the bullet, and possibly being the 
> better man? I will agree with the idea that throwing accusations 
> around on a public mailing list should take a bit of proof, otherwise 
> it's just going to rile people up.  I may be throwing gas on the fire, 
> but this discussion isn't really conducive to either side.
>
> </meddling>
>
And on that note...let's just put this to rest.

At this point, I don't think there is any more that anybody can say that 
will provide any value, unless we go back to the original topic.

If anybody would like to discuss this with me OFF LIST (yes, even you 
Sergio), that's fine, but after more than 50 messages in 24 hours, we're 
doing nothing more than beating a dead horse.

As I've stated previously, I'm going to continue my work with 
chan_skinny, regardless of whether it's the popular thing to do or not.