[asterisk-dev] chan_skinny fixes

[Sergio Chersovani]

Jeremy McNamara ha scritto:
> Here we go again - how does one function equal 50% of a HUGE patch?    
> One very trivial, very standard function MAY have been used, which 
> still remains to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Any developer can confirm this:
That patch has a bunch of constants rename (that reflects the chan_sccp 
constants name) + some structure
The only relevant addition in that patch is the button template function 
(the one included in the chan_sccp project since july or august 2005)

So stop it!

Sergio