[asterisk-dev] New Feature request on Mantis requests your input (6753)

[Joshua Colp]

Nickolay V. Shmyrev wrote:
>>> Isn't shim a channel actually? I am afraid that additional entity will
>>> complicate things, isn't it better to create channels that are able to
>>> transform sound frames and connect those channels together instead of
>>> using shims between channels. Gstreamer for example has pads that can be
>>> connected according to input/output mime types. I think this model is
>>> easier to program, understand and setup. 
>>>
> 
> [trim]
> 
>> Are you talking actual Asterisk channels or just using channel as a term?
> 
> About channel as a term or an entity :) Assuming that Asterisk's channel
> is also channel.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

I suppose you could call it a channel. I'm thinking along the same 
lines, we're just using different terms to express it. And as you can 
see using the channel term can get things confused as I thought you 
literally meant an Asterisk channel.

-- 
Joshua Colp
Software Developer
Digium
P - 256-428-6066
C - 506-878-0147
jcolp at digium.com