[asterisk-dev] chan_skinny fixes

[North Antara]

Jeremy McNamara wrote:

> Sergio Chersovani wrote:
>
>> Again, not true North. The list of patch submitters is always 
>> published on the release note so it's really easy to get disclaimers.
>> The users that submit patches are all members of the mailing list
>
>
> Then stop your bitching and go get disclaimers - then we can merge 
> everyones work into a SINGLE SCCP based channel driver for asterisk.
>
>
> Jeremy McNamara
>
Jeremy,
    I couldn't have said it any better myself.

Sergio,
    Prove us wrong.  If you're serious about it, we can work together on 
this.  I'd be willing to drop most of what I've done, and get chan_sccp 
into svn trunk shape (formatting, etc).  There would be no more issues 
with not being supported, since it wouldn't be a third-party channel 
driver anymore.  As for being auto-adaptive, that won't really matter 
after a short period of time, since it would eventually be in a release 
version, and it wouldn't matter what version of svn they're running, 
since it would come with the right version of channel driver.

    You would have to get a disclaimer from everybody who has ever 
contributed to chan_sccp since branching off from chan_skinny, INCLUDING 
the people who did so before you forked the fork (at least, that's the 
story I've gotten).  Until we can verify everybody's disclaimer, I'll 
continue doing what I'm doing.