[asterisk-dev] chan_skinny fixes

[Pavel Jezek]

Hello North,
I'm happy when reading that another work in implementing skinny protocol 
into asterisk,
but I thing, that too much work must be done to implement at least 
functionality thas currently already done in chan_sccp,
but because even chan_sccp is not perfect, it would be great, if 
developers can cooperate in same thing,
so are you definitively sure, that cooperative work with Sergio isn't 
possible?
I didn't read any note in chan_sccp forum, that isn't possible to 
cooperate in chan_sccp work ... ;-)
PJ




North Antara wrote:
> All,
>    You might be asking yourself, "Olle has all of these great patches, 
> and I'm so bored during the weekend, but I'm stuck with this stupid 
> sccp firmware Cisco phone.  What can I do to help?" - well, fret no 
> more, I've got great news for you!
>
>    I've recently started working on the chan_skinny code, and I need 
> help with testing.  I'm hoping to get something that actually works 
> (and works well) by the end of April, so I need all the help I can 
> get.  In case you're wondering, the reasons I'm working on 
> chan_skinny, instead of using something like chan_sccp, are A) Sergio 
> (maintainer of chan_sccp) hasn't used a single patch I've sent him 
> (others feel the same way), and he won't give access to his cvs/svn 
> repos to help code, B) chan_sccp is not now, and never will be 
> disclaimed.  Instead of yet another fork, I decided (with the help and 
> encouragement of several others) to just fix the original.
>
>    If you feel like testing, or even adding code, feel free to visit 
> http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6859, and give your input - I'd 
> love to hear it.
>
>
> North Antara
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev