[Asterisk-Dev] asterisk 'stable'?

[Terry Wilson]

Odd, I've been using realtime for thousands of users with an average of many 
calls per second using realtime sip. Now, I don't use realtime extensions, 
which may be what you are talking about because I can't add contexts easily 
in realtime. Having to have a switch statement in a static file (which means 
a reload on adding a context) makes it non-realtime for our purposes. (And, 
last time I checked it still did the same query at least 3x in a row each 
time as a hold-over from the IAX switch, gah!)

On 9/13/05, alex at pilosoft.com <alex at pilosoft.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Sherwood McGowan wrote:
> 
> > That's too simple mate, Asterisk RealTime.... use multiple servers with
> > a common database interface for configurations. I personally like using
> > MySQL clustering, but you could use whatever... Or, you could code your
> > interface to allow for selecting what user is on a server by extension,
> > area code, exchange, whatever. I already do this to a small degree and
> > I'm working to make ARTCP (Asterisk RealTime Control Panel) have this
> > functionality.
> good luck scaling realtime to hundreds of channels.
> 
> realtime, as currently implemented, is very inefficient for high loads.
> 
> -alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20050914/fc38f704/attachment.htm