[Asterisk-Dev] asterisk 'stable'?

[Steven Critchfield]

On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 22:20 +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> hi
> 
> i just wonder
> 
> the asterisk 1.0 is named stable, and as i've been told that's  
> because it's feature-frozen.
> 
> will there ever bee a STABLE asterisk, as in 'does not crash'?
> 
> best regards

If you treat it right it doesn't crash. I routinely see long periods of
uptime of the asterisk process itself. 

For that matter I am still running installs that are pre 1.0 on some
machines that are not crash prone.
-- 
Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>