[Asterisk-Dev] rfc3389 status?

[Brian K. West]

You don¹t need fine grain for this 10ms is fine for this.

/b


On 9/10/05 12:55 PM, "Mike Taht" <mike.taht at gmail.com> wrote:

> I note that the current kernel realtime-prempt patch has finally merged in the
> hi-res timers patch, so (at least theoretically) there are very fine grained
> timers available in userspace for people willing to go PREEMPT-RT.
> 
> On 9/10/05, Brian K. West <brian at bkw.org> wrote:
>> Let me get woke up here where I have some sense in my head.... *SMACK*
>> 
>> Ok I think that is one of the only issues I hear people talk about is MOH
>> gets mucked up in ast_rtp_bridge and if that one thing could be fixed it
>> would be less of an issue at this time.
>> 
>> /b
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/10/05 10:55 AM, "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming at digium.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> > That's probably only true because of the MOH being provided by a
>>> > generator, which is based off of a timing source.
>>> >
>>> > Given that information, though, it should be possible to get
>>> > ast_rtp_bridge() to be able to accomplish the same thing that the
>>> > generic bridge is doing.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>> <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev>
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20050910/7b5af2f3/attachment.htm