[Asterisk-Dev] dev conf topic: better CDRs

Tom Dickenson voip at digitaldatabits.net
Fri Feb 25 14:30:17 MST 2005


Segregate the database each week or month to reduce the call logging?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Middleton" <james.middleton at comcast.net>
To: "'Asterisk Developers Mailing List'" <asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 7:18 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Dev] dev conf topic: better CDRs


> Records of 'Communications' are specifically included in section 802-1 of
17
> CFR part 210. What is of note is that the requirement for retention of
> records is moving from 5 to 7 years. (see link below)
>
> CDR would fall under this ruling (IMHO). The law is so vague that
compliance
> could mean almost anything concerning phone conversations. Some
> interpretations would require voice recording of all conversations while
> others say that simply documenting that the conversation occured is
> sufficient for compliance. Does conferencing another extensionn count?
>
> If you had 7 years of CDR data on the * server, what impact would a query
> looking for all instances of extension 'A' talking to callers from DID
range
> 'B' have on the system? Let's say in this case, the system is installed in
a
> large financial institution with 10,000 BHCC and average total daily
volume
> of 60,000 calls. Assuming no weekends and a few holidays let's call the
> annual work days at 250 which means 15 million calls/year or 105 million
> calls over a 7 year period. Now let's add each and every call event
> including trunk active, reciept of caller ID, phone ringing, phone
answered,
> caller placed on hold, etc.... I'll assume that the average call only has
10
> associated events (very conservative). This would mean at the end of 7
years
> you would have 1.05 billion data events to look through.
>
>
http://www.sarbanes-oxley.com/displaysection.php?level=2&pub_id=SEC-Rules&ch
> ap_id=SEC8&message_id=154
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of C. Maj
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 8:07 AM
> To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Dev] dev conf topic: better CDRs
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, James Middleton waxed:
>
> 8<'s
>
> > Let's say I do want to push the CDR data off to another server (I
> certainly
> > don't want to do data mining on my live PBX across 5 years of data -
don't
> > forget Sarbanes-Oxley). If the link drops (ie second server with CDR
>
> This is totally off topic, but I didn't realize the Enron
> Act required tracking phone records ?  What sort of detail
> is required ?  Do you have a good link or anything I could
> read about this ?
>
> Thanks,
> --Chris
>
>
> --
> Chris Maj, Rochester
> cmaj_at_freedomcorpse_dot_com
> Pronunciation Guide: Maj == May
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>




More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list