[Asterisk-Dev] Refined Voice CallerID Announce

Richard Lyman pchammer at dynx.net
Wed Feb 23 10:43:06 MST 2005


Steve McMahon wrote:

> Some people are not made of money and can afford Cisco 7690 Phone's and
> other equipment for thier office So I must tell you that you are pretty lame
> in the fact of your remark. Actually I think your an asshole I follow this
> channel quite well and read all the messages and yes you are sincerely an
> asshole. Stephen Critchfield and I think the public knows that but, I'll
> just say it. I could be banned from this room for my actions but I think
> your response was uncalled for.
> 
> It's not the Extra .50 Cents for the phone, it's the office system I use
> that makes it difficult to do this, since I use a Comdial No308 that has
> phones without CallerID and do not modulate like typical phones because it
> is a special box that powers and controls the phones.
> 
> <I Can't wait to have our how communications office read this email as well>
> 
> And Mr Critchfield Guy if you were to use festival to transcode the callers
> name into asterisk on the current channel,
> 
> HOW WOULD YOU DO SUCH A THING? Since you suggested it?
> 
> 
>>Are there still people unwilling to spring the extra 50 cents to get
>>caller-id on a phone?
>>
>>This isn't an applet. You are wanting to use festival to deal with the
>>fact that the caller-id text could be anything.
>>
>>In fact if you put it together, I might have to play tricks on you
>>sending unpronounceable text in the caller-id.
>>-- 
>>Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>
>>
hey Mr TopPoster Guy, maybe if you stop sending crap emails and 
maybe taken the time to learn about things like irc and a tts 
module...  maybe this would be such a HARD THING TO UNDERSTAND! 
Sinec you obviously have way too much time on your hands.





More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list