[Asterisk-Dev] Linux leaves Bitkeeper: quite a dustup

[Paul Querna]

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Steven wrote:
> 
>> With at least this portion of the thread showing some merit and some
>> tangential relation to this list, I'll offer up that arch be considered.
>> Specifically it is a good option for those who may be harboring private
>> change sets that either can not be contributed or would not be
>> accepted.  
> 
> 
> Right, that is one the big reasons to consider switching in the first 
> place. Also, there is some value in being able to host a development 
> 'server' with commit permissions granted individually per-branch, 
> something that CVS/SVN/etc. cannot do.

Huh?  Subversion can have commit permissions per-branch, per-directory, 
or even per-file:

-Paul