[Asterisk-Dev] backporting persisent queues?

[Jerris, Michael MI]

Now this could be a worthwhile use for the patches stuff in the makefile
that mark had been playing with.  Then again, a much better way to do
this would be to try to set a more frequent release schedule, that would
keep us from having features unavailable to "stable" users for so long.
Anyone for a 3 month cycle, head-->test-->release, shifting down 1 level
every 3 months or so?  What do we need in place for "testing" for this
to be worthwhile?  

Mike  

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Kann
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:44 PM
To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] backporting persisent queues?


On Apr 8, 2005, at 10:29 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:

> Greg Boehnlein wrote:
>> However, it should NOT go into the Stable CVS tree. I would advocate 
>> setting up a "stable-backports" directory with patches that people 
>> can apply if they wish.
>> Any comments?
>
> Wouldn't then, some/all backports be against specific versions of 
> stable?

Yes, but then stable doesn't move very quickly (by definition), so
patches won't bit-rot very fast.

-SteveK

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev