[Asterisk-Dev] status of new jitterbuffer?

[Peter Svensson]

On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Steve Kann wrote:

> On Apr 2, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Richard Scobie wrote:
> > Any more thoughts on PLC for xLAW systems with no translations, which 
> > I believe currently is non-functional?
> 
> The only time this comes up, really, is if one leg of your call goes to 
> TDM (either chan_zap, or if any of the other TDM devices support xLaw). 
>    The simplest way to do this is to force the device into Signed Linear 
> mode, and force a translation to happen.  Otherwise, you need to 
> implement the PLC stuff in the channel drivers themselves.

Is that the recommended way to handle digital zap channels as well? We 
could use the jitterbuffer on our PRI gateway. Normally we use alaw for 
the ip links as well. 

Peter