[Asterisk-Dev] SS7 for *

Steve Underwood steveu at coppice.org
Tue Oct 19 07:48:24 MST 2004


Hi Ben

Have you bought into the hype about internet time? :-)

I said it was being tested, and it is. SS7 is quite big, so you don't 
give it a quick try and say all is well. It is functioning well enough 
to be handling traffic at a test site in Europe. Give it a few more 
weeks, and a solid polished solution should be available.

Regards,
Steve

Ben Merrills wrote:

>What's the latest on the SS7 development? It seems to be a quiet topic
>now, which worries me :)
>
>Steve, you mentioned someone was testing the SS7 drivers, are they
>proving successful? As I've said before I'm very interested in getting
>my hands on them.
>
>Just an update would be cool,
>
>Cheers,
>
>Ben Merrills
>Griffin Internet
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com
>[mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve
>Underwood
>Sent: 05 October 2004 00:35
>To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] SS7 for *
>
>Tom Zimnicki wrote:
>
>  
>
>>[...]
>>Not knowing who these guys are, there may be at least two other *SS7 
>>groups working out there.
>>    
>>
>
>Possible, but somewhat unlikely. There have been a number of people who 
>thought it must be easy to achieve SS7 for *, starting from openss7. 
>Nobody has actually got anywhere with that approach. We looked at the 
>openss7 code. We moved on, and built something new from scratch. Just 
>from the looking at the history of this thing, I would be surprised if 
>another viable SS7 for * project exists.
>
>  
>
>>Why waste resources and effort if folks can agree on a common set of 
>>goals?
>>    
>>
>
>That assumes a common set of goals it achievable. With the problems we 
>still face over approvals, and so on, we can't even agree on 100% of our
>
>own goals. :-)
>
>Regards,
>Steve
>  
>




More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list