[Asterisk-Dev] Is there a need for a DS3 channel/driver?

[alex at pilosoft.com]

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Mike M wrote:

> Sometimes in the so-called unchannelized streams you are informed of
> where the frame boundry is in the bitstream.  With that information one
> can create soft-channelization.  Perhaps this is unreasonable for a DS3
> however.
Given that its a tough problem to drive current generation of quad-T1 
cards without frame slips, I think doing soft-ds3 stuff is crazy. It could 
be possible given enough buffers...But I think its crazy ;)
-alex