Subversion... was RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Solaris Port (was: asterisk-users: Re: Fedora Core 2 and Kernel 2.6)

[Dr. Rich Murphey]

Sure!  Darcs would certainly facilitate the flow of patches.

Bitkeeper would do so as well, as long as there were someone to host it.

Again, consider me a last resort for hosting any of these -- whatever
everyone can agree on.

Cheers,
Rich




> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-dev-admin at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-dev-
> admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Kohlsmith
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 8:25 AM
> To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: Subversion... was RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Solaris Port (was:
> asterisk-users: Re: Fedora Core 2 and Kernel 2.6)
> 
> > One of the things recently that caught my attention that would be of use
> > to people tracking private patches to asterisk is the ability to mirror
> > the tree. There is even some tools to be able to do "offline" work where
> > you make a personal mirror and work from there then merge your mirror
> > back to the main repository when you are back "online".
> 
> For the Vexi project we are using Darcs -- it seems to work VERY well --
> anyone can have their own repository and patches can be intermingled as it
> keeps the context of every patch entered.
> 
> Downsides: It's written in haskell
> Downsides: it's not at 1.0 yet
> 
> Despite those two downsides, we've been having great success.  Haskell's
> only
> a downside since it's a pain to install unless you use the binary haskell
> interpreter/compiler.
> 
> http://abridgegame.org/darcs/
> 
> Regards,
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev